‘Reviews’
I’ve been really impressed with this book, and have returned to it often when trying to “think things out”. The author writes in a good style that seems to be missing from a lot of the shooting literature. I don’t get the impression he wants to spend a lot of time telling me how good he is, and why he’s an expert, and I appreciate that the book focuses on the shotguns instead.
I’m a bit surprised about a section I read regarding birdshot penetration (basically saying that two sheets of drywall should soak up most of the shot), which doesn’t match up with the video work we’ve done here so far. I’ll have to get through the rest of the book and see what it says, and then maybe I’ll have to send the author a letter to see if that’s what he actually meant. Definitely worth the money, and I was happy to see an endorsement by Col. Cooper in the foreword, which convinced me that I hadn’t ill spent my cash.
Editorial Review
By Ike
I purchased the M-1500 Hunter Lightning chambered in .30-06 5 years ago. I have been very happy with the gun itself. The gun came with a scope that I have been less than impressed with. If you haven’t specifically heard of Howa don’t dismiss it. Many larger name manufactures have bought Howa manufactured firearms. The gun is an excellent shooter.
Pros
- The gun is very light weight and accurate.
Cons
- As far as I can tell the gun really has no cons. I might enjoy the varmint version for shooting a little more, but I certainly would not enjoy lugging the heavier gun around the mountains of Colorado!
Summary
This is a great gun for hunting. It is accurate, and cost effective. If you buy this gun you won’t be afraid to carry it through the brush and ruin the stock (you also won’t display it in your collectors case either). Now that you can purchase it with a stainless barrel snow and sleet should be less of a concern as well.
The Ruger Mini-14 is a popular and reliable semi-automatic carbine chambered to shoot .223 Remington or 5.56×45mm NATO. The design shows influences from the Garand and M-14, particularly with its rotating bolt and trigger/safety setup. The action is driven by a gas piston system with a fixed-piston and moving gas cylinder. Ammunition is fed via a box magazine similar to the AR-15/M-16’s (although not quite interchangeable). Factory magazines for civilians have a capacity of 5 rounds although 3rd party magazines have capacities of 10, 20, 30 or more rounds. Higher capacity factory magazines have been made available to law enforcement.
Variations have been made on the Mini-14 in chamberings (7.62×39mm and 6.8mm Rem. SPC) and even a target version in .223 has been produced. Next, are the latest specifications of the traditional ranch rifle.
Specs
Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle, 580 Series
Caliber: .223 Rem
Capacity: 5-40 round magazines*
Finishes: Blued/Matte Stainless (aka All-Weather)
Stocks: Hardwood/Synthetic
Barrel Length: 18 1/2″
Grooves: 6
Twist: 1:9″ RH
Overall Length: 37 1/4″
Weight: 6 3/4 lbs
Front Sight(s): Protected Blade
Rear Sight(s): Ghost Ring Adjustable Aperture
* For civilians, Ruger only supplies 5 round magazines. Aftermarket magazines of higher capacity are available.
Reviews
- 580 Series Mini-14 Ranch Rifle Review
- J. Dewey Muzzle Guide Review
- ProMag 20 Round Steel Magazine Review
- Gunblast.com Review
- AR-15 vs. Mini-14
- Rifle Shooter Review
Off-site Links
- Manufacturer Sturm Ruger
- Mini-14 Manual
- Ruger Website
Forums
Parts/Accessories
Ruger GP 100
The pistol was the last firearm that I picked up to round out my collection. It’s a hard decision – semi-auto or reolver? I have a Winchester 1894 in .357 Magnum so I was interested in getting another gun that shot that round. So that immediately narrows it down to a revolver (lots of choices) or a Desert Eagle (which is about the only semi-auto on the market chambered in .357 Magnum). While the Desert Eagle guns are nice, they’re also pretty pricey, running on average about $1,000 US. If I went the revolver route, I had a lot of choices basically starting at $300 and on up, with $500 being the price on average.
Going with a revolver wasn’t such a bad deal for me. I have a lot of interest in single-action revolvers, and considered getting a Ruger Blackhawk for a really long time. In all honestly, I thought I’d get that Ruger up until a day or so before the purchase. What held me back was the fact that this was the first revolver I was going to purchase. I had the goals of:
- Get good at shooting with a handgun
- Have a handgun I could take hunting (elk) and camping
I specifically wasn’t interested in (at least for this gun/purchase):
- Concealed carry
- Home defense (I prefer the shotgun)
Given the goals I had, I focused in on guns that offered a 6” barrel, and at least 6 shots. Given the supply at the local Sportsman’s Warehouse, I held and researched a Smith and Wesson 686, a Taurus 627, and a Ruger GP100. There are plenty of reviews on the web, and all the guns are considered good by many. These are just my thoughts and impressions:
Price
I start off with price, because it’s the main thing that controls what guns I can think about getting at a given time. Sure, you can read plenty of articles on tricked out race guns, and while they are cool and accurate, they’re also generally beyond the reach of a lot of buyers.
The S&W was out of the running right away, because it was nearly $150 more than either the Taurus or the Ruger (which cost about $450).
Capacity
The Taurus held seven rounds, and the Ruger only holds 6. While there is a Taurus out there that holds 8 rounds of .357 Magnum, it wasn’t available locally. Frankly, I don’t think that 7 is that much of an advantage over 6, and I specifically wasn’t worried about defense uses. I have bought 3 speed loaders over time, and while it’s certainly not as fast as popping in a new magazine, it’s fast enough for me at this time. That means I can get 24 shots (6 in plus 3*6 speed loads) in less than a minute, assuming double action shooting. Of course with .357 Magnum loads, I’d say my ability to hit drops to 75% (paper plate at 10 yards) right now and there’s not much use racing it like that. If you assume that I’ll be shooting slower than that for better accuracy (and precision), then 24 rounds spread out over several (3-5) minutes seems fine.
Grip
Taurus makes a really big deal about their flex grip, custom molding on their pistols. I really liked it too, but the overall width of the grip seemed too narrow for my hands. I’m sure this is something specific to me, and everyone has to try it out on their own.
The Ruger grip felt extremely nice in my hand. It has a much wider width than the Taurus, and the inlaid wood looked nicer in my opinion.
Weight
Both the Taurus and the Ruger weigh in at the 50+ ounce range, but that didn’t really bother me. I lift fairly regularly, so this may be less of an issue for me than others. Again, you’ll just have to try it out.
Other
For better or worse, there’s a lot of pages you can find on the net about problems with the Taurus revolvers. I couldn’t find much negative said about Ruger, but sometimes I think that’s just North American bias (maybe not?). That being said, I figured that if the pistol didn’t work out, the Ruger would have higher resale value in the long haul. I’m still interested in Taurus, as their Judge revolver in .410/.45LC seems like an interesting proposition.
Shooting the GP100
I’ve really enjoyed shooting the GP100. By now, I’ve put nearly 500 rounds through it, and I’ve never had a problem. Of course it’s a revolver, and I’d expect fewer issues than a semi-automatic pistol, but it’s still nice to say “problem free”.
I did eventually pick up a shoulder holster for it, as it’s much nicer to keep track of it that way at the range. I went with a simple “Old Mike’s Cross draw shoulder holster”, which I find is easier to carry a large 6” barrel gun like the GP100.
- Frank
